No Deference to Congress

Huh.

Elena Kagan believes that the Supreme Court is not "deferential enough" to Congress.

Hold on one moment while I attempt to keep my blood pressure from going up like Pompeii.

Ok, here we go:

In case no one ever informed you, you pimple on the ass of a halfway decent paralegal, IT IS NOT THE SUPREME COURT'S JOB TO BE DEFERENTIAL TO ANYTHING EXCEPT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. IF ANYTHING, CONGRESS IS SUPPOSED TO BE DEFERENTIAL TO THE SUPREME COURT AND ABIDE BY ITS INTERPRETATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION.

If you ever want to be more than a worthless, scum sucking, slimy residue of a two week old afterbirth, you will READ THE CONSTITUTION, AS WELL AS THE OTHER WRITINGS OF OUR FOUNDERS and realize that the original intent of the Founders was to DENY the federal government any powers that were not explicitly granted via the Constitution.

That statement alone proves that you are completely unfit for practice as a judge at any level, much less at the level of the Supreme Court. Half the problems facing this country today come from the outdated and archaic concept of the Presumption of Constitutionality. This concept might have been worth something back when our political leadership was actually worth the price of a used Yugo, but has no place in society today, where some of our so-called "leaders" don't even know what is in the document they swore to uphold!

Cthulhu weeps. At least she'll be safe from the brain-eating zombies - she obviously doesn't have any nutritional value for them.